![]() ![]() ![]() (You can access the Display Options window by holding down the Command key on a Mac or the Control key on a PC and then pressing the D key.) You can determine which method is used by checking or unchecking “Use Bass Note to Determine Chord Spelling” in the Display Options window. Maestro tests help fill a gap amongst tests that focus on parts of your app in isolation.Classroom Maestro uses two different methods for spelling notes. Plus connected tests can cover components in isolation so they can set their data up more quickly than Maestro tests.ĭespite their tradeoffs, Maestro tests are still a great way to write high-level tests to give your app the safety Keep the majority of your tests as connected tests.Ĭonnected tests give your more control over the interactions so you can simulate happy paths as well as error scenarios. My vote on test types is to write Maestro tests to cover key high-level flows in your app, but Happy-path tests and aren't the speediest tests. Maestro tests are great to verify the app works from your users' perspective, but the tests are largely How many Maestro tests should you write vs other types of tests? If you add Maestro tests into your app's test suite, you may wonder - what should you test with Maestro? ![]() MaestroTest ) įull code and docs for the Gradle plugin are available at: Which tests to write? On MacOS, you can install the Maestro CLI with Homebrew:ġ task maestroTest ( type: com. To get started with Maestro, first install the Maestro CLI. That way you can verify the different components of your application do work together to deliver the user experience Tapping on the screen, entering text using the keyboard, etc. Maestro lets you write high-level tests (or "flows" in Maestro terminology) that interact with your app the same way as your users. High-level tests are great to have as a safety net to ensure my components worked together, in addition to the isolated, focused tests I'd written. I didn't have the type of high-level integration/functional test that I'd have in webapp development with a browser testing tool like Cypress. While these tests are valuable, they're verifying different components of the application work in isolation. connected tests for the Room persistence layer.connected tests for each screen and key components.When building this app, I started with a few different types of tests that let me check different parts functionality: I can then start progress towards one of these goals throughout the week to track my progress.Īnd when I inevitably forget to start the timer until I'm halfway through my morning workout, Whereas with weekly goals I can make up time the next day without feeling like I failed.Īs an example, say I have goals to exercise for 4 hours each week, read for at least 2 hours, and write for 2 hours: Plus it can be demoralizing to miss a daily goal for a couple days in a row, making it easy to give up. My schedule is too varied day-to-day to successfully finish daily goals of say, read X minutes a day.īut I found that setting goals per week helped me achieve those goals more easily than trying to find time each and every day to make progress on these goals. With this app, I can set goals for the week and track my progress towards those goals. For fun I've recently been building an Android app with Kotlin and Compose. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |